Opinion
Case Number 13-13611
11-18-2014
LISA ARNETT-LANGLEY, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
Presently before the Court is the report issued on October 29, 2014 by Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment and deny the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Although the report stated that the parties to this action could object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [dkt. #19] is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [dkt. #13] is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment [dkt. #17] is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's complaint [dkt. #1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
s/David M. Lawson
DAVID M. LAWSON
United States District Judge
Dated: November 18, 2014
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on November 18, 2014.
s/Susan Pinkowski
SUSAN PINKOWSKI