From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 26, 2017
CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-00493-CWR-FKB (S.D. Miss. Jun. 26, 2017)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-00493-CWR-FKB

06-26-2017

MAX DESHUND ARMSTRONG PLAINTIFF v. ZANTARIOUS WILLIAMS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball, which was entered on May 26, 2017. Docket No. 41. The Report and Recommendation clearly notified the parties that failure to file written objections to the findings and recommendations contained therein within 14 days after service would bar further appeal in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. Id .

This Court, finding that there has been no submission of written objections by any party, hereby adopts said Report and Recommendation as the Order of this Court. Accordingly, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted.

SO ORDERED, this the 26th day of June, 2017.

s/ Carlton W. Reeves

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 26, 2017
CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-00493-CWR-FKB (S.D. Miss. Jun. 26, 2017)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:MAX DESHUND ARMSTRONG PLAINTIFF v. ZANTARIOUS WILLIAMS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 26, 2017

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-00493-CWR-FKB (S.D. Miss. Jun. 26, 2017)