From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. TD Bank

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 24, 2023
22-cv-02729-JST (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-02729-JST

01-24-2023

MADELINE ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. TD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT

RE: ECF NO. 46

JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties have filed a notice of settlement. ECF No. 46. Accordingly, any scheduled hearings or deadlines are vacated, and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall close the file.

This order will be vacated if any party, after meeting and conferring with opposing parties, files a notice that settlement has not occurred within 60 days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. TD Bank

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 24, 2023
22-cv-02729-JST (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Armstrong v. TD Bank

Case Details

Full title:MADELINE ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. TD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 24, 2023

Citations

22-cv-02729-JST (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2023)