From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Dec 14, 2017
No. 4D17-3118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2017)

Opinion

No. 4D17-3118

12-14-2017

GERALD ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Gerald Armstrong, Sneads, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432008CF000030A. Gerald Armstrong, Sneads, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. MAY, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Dec 14, 2017
No. 4D17-3118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Armstrong v. State

Case Details

Full title:GERALD ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Dec 14, 2017

Citations

No. 4D17-3118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2017)