From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 21, 1980
383 So. 2d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 79-105.

May 21, 1980.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Polk County; Oliver L. Green, Jr., Judge.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and Michael E. Raiden, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Daniel Junior Armstrong appeals from the judgment entered upon his nolo contendere pleas to burglary and grand theft. The appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain admissions made to the police.

We are unable to determine the appellant's appeal on the merits. Under Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla. 1979), only legally dispositive issues may be reserved for appeal following a nolo contendere plea. We find that the appellant did not reserve a legally dispositive issue, and therefore is not entitled to an appeal.

The appellant's plea was entered before the Brown decision. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court with instructions that the appellant be afforded an opportunity to withdraw his plea. See Pittman v. State, 382 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 2d DCA, 1979), on rehearing (Fla. 2d DCA, Jan. 30, 1980), rehearing denied (Fla. 2d DCA, May 8, 1980).

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 21, 1980
383 So. 2d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Armstrong v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL JUNIOR ARMSTRONG, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 21, 1980

Citations

383 So. 2d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)