From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Shirvell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 19, 2012
Case No. 11-11921 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 11-11921

06-19-2012

CHRISTOPHER ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, v. ANDREW SHIRVELL, Defendant/Counter Claimant.


SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ARTHUR J. TARNOW


ORDER DENYING CURTIS JACKSON'S MOTION

TO BE PRODUCED AS A WITNESS [143],


TERMINATING AS MOOT CURTIS JACKSON'S MOTION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [144],


TERMINATING AS MOOT JACKSON'S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [145],


and


DENYING CURTIS JACKSON'S MOTION

TO STRIKE [151]

Before the Court are three motions filed by Curtis Jackson: 1) Motion to Be Produced As a Witness [143]; 2) Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus [144]; and 3) Motion to Strike [151]. Defendant Shrivell filed a Response [147] to Motions [143] and [144]. Jackson included a Reply to Shirvell's Response in his Motion [151]. Also before the Court is Jackson's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [145].

Jackson is not a party to the litigation. Jackson provides no authority that supports his request to be produced as a witness. Therefore, the Court will not order him to be produced.

Because the Court will not order Jackson to be produced as a witness as this time, there is no need for a writ of habeas corpus. Jackson's Motion for a Writ [144] is, therefore, moot.

Jackson argues that Shirvell's Response [147] should be stricken from the record because Jackson does not approve of the information included in the filing. Jackson, however, provides no authority to support such an action. Therefore, Jackson's Motion to Strike [151] is denied.

Finally, Jackson filed an Application [145] to proceed in forma pauperis in this litigation. Jackson is not a party to the litigation and is not bringing claims against Plaintiff or Defendant in this case. Therefore, there is no need for a waiver of filing fees or costs. The Application [145] is terminated as moot.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Jackson's Motion to Be Produced As a Witness [143] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jackson's Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus [144] is TERMINATED AS MOOT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jackson's Motion to Strike Defendant's Pleading [151] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jackson's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [145] is TERMINATED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

___________________________

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify on June 19, 2012 that I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered electronically. I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to the following non-registered ECF participants on June 19, 2012: Curtis Jackson.

Michael E. Lang

Deputy Clerk to

District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow

(313) 234-5182


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Shirvell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 19, 2012
Case No. 11-11921 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Shirvell

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, v. ANDREW SHIRVELL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 19, 2012

Citations

Case No. 11-11921 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 19, 2012)