From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Shasta County Probation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 11, 2008
No. CIV S-06-1447 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1447 LKK GGH P.

February 11, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's January 17, 2008 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Shasta County Probation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 11, 2008
No. CIV S-06-1447 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Shasta County Probation

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD L. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. SHASTA COUNTY PROBATION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 11, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1447 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008)