From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Rickard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1929
226 App. Div. 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

June 18, 1929.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

Nathan Burkan, for the appellants Madison Square Garden Corporation and Madison Square Garden Sporting Club, Inc.

Nathan Burkan of counsel [ Chadbourne, Stanchfield Levy, attorneys], for the appellant New York Trust Company.

Martin Conboy of counsel [ David Asch with him on the brief], for the respondent.

Present — DOWLING, P.J., MERRELL, FINCH, McAVOY and PROSKAUER, JJ.


The present action was commenced more than eight years ago. No steps have been taken by plaintiff to prosecute the same. The action has lain dormant all these years, and it was not until the death of George L. Rickard, the principal defendant, with whom the plaintiff is alleged to have entered into an oral contract of joint venture, that the plaintiff took any steps to revive the action. The plaintiff has been guilty of unreasonable neglect in failing to proceed in the action or to prosecute the same with diligence. We do not think there is any merit whatever in the plaintiff's alleged cause of action, and the same should be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to the provisions of section 181 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice. (See Mason v. Sanford, 137 N.Y. 497, 500; Duffy v. Duffy, 117 id. 647; Hayes v. Nourse, 114 id. 595.)

The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the plaintiff's motion denied, and the cross-motion of the defendants for a dismissal of the plaintiff's complaint granted, with ten dollars costs.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellants, plaintiff's motion denied, and the cross-motion of defendants for order dismissing the complaint granted, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Rickard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1929
226 App. Div. 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Rickard

Case Details

Full title:FRANK C. ARMSTRONG, Respondent, v. GEORGE L. RICKARD, Otherwise Known as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
235 N.Y.S. 521