From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Redding Parole Dept.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 1, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1576-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1576-GEB-CMK

09-01-2011

JERRY W. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. REDDING PAROLE DEPT., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the court is plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2). Plaintiff's complaint, and service thereof by the United States Marshal if appropriate, will be addressed separately. The Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons or set this matter for an initial scheduling conference unless specifically directed by the court to do so.

Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security therefor.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted.

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Redding Parole Dept.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 1, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1576-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Redding Parole Dept.

Case Details

Full title:JERRY W. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. REDDING PAROLE DEPT., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1576-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)