From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Overton

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 8, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-152 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 8, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-152 Erie.

February 8, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on June 14, 2007 and was referred to Chief United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on January 16, 2008 [33], recommends that the Plaintiff's motion for "Injunction for Relief Retaliatory Conduct" [31] be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service in which to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at SCI Albion, where he is incarcerated, and on the Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 2008;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for "Injunction for Relief Retaliatory Conduct" [31] be, and hereby is, DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated January 16, 2008 [33], is adopted as the opinion of this Court.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Overton

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 8, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-152 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Overton

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. MAXINE OVERTON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 8, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-152 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 8, 2008)