From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. North Carolina

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Oct 27, 2023
1:23-cv-642 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-642

10-27-2023

ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA, and ACE TOWING AND RECOVERY, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the court for review of the Recommendation (“Recommendation”) filed on September 21, 2023, by the Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (Doc. 2.) The Recommendation was served on the Plaintiff on September 21, 2023. (Doc. 3.) Plaintiff filed a pleading, “Motion for Leave to File Complaint, with Supporting Affidavit and Documentation, in Support and with Objection to Magistrate's Recommendation to Dismiss,” which the court construes as an objection to the Recommendation. (Doc. 4.)

This court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [Magistrate Judge's] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the [M]agistrate [J]udge . . . [O]r recommit the matter to the [M]agistrate [J]udge with instructions.”

This court has appropriately reviewed the Recommendation and Plaintiff's filing and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. This court therefore adopts the Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 2), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without a certification that an appeal would have any merit.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall pay $100 as a monetary sanction for this continuation of his long-standing pattern of frivolous litigation conduct, and further that Plaintiff is ENJOINED from filing any document with this Court in any case unless and until he first pays any outstanding monetary sanction(s) and that any documents submitted to the Court by Plaintiff prior to such payment shall be held for his retrieval or returned to him without docketing.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. North Carolina

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Oct 27, 2023
1:23-cv-642 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Armstrong v. North Carolina

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA, and ACE TOWING AND…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 27, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-642 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 2023)