From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Lappin

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 16, 2011
09-cv-07370 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2011)

Opinion

09-cv-07370 (BSJ).

August 16, 2011


Order


After having reviewed Magistrate Judge Katz's Report and Recommendation dated July 20, 2011, and having received no objections thereto, I hereby confirm and adopt the Report in its entirety, having been satisfied that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See King v. Greiner, No. 02 Civ. 5810 (DLC), 2009 WL 2001439, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. July 8, 2009) (citation omitted); see also Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). Accordingly, Plaintiff's action is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Armstrong's failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008).

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Lappin

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 16, 2011
09-cv-07370 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Lappin

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN A. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. HARLEY LAPPIN, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 16, 2011

Citations

09-cv-07370 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2011)