From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Dec 1, 2016
NO. 02-16-00362-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 02-16-00362-CV

12-01-2016

CLAYTON ARMSTRONG AND U-TURN WORLD MINISTRIES APPELLANTS v. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF A.P. EQUIPMENT & RENTALS, INC. D/B/A AIR POWER SUPPLY & SERVICE APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 2016-001179-3 MEMORANDUM OPINIONAND JUDGMENT

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

On October 7, 2016, and November 7, 2016, we notified appellants in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $205 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Appellants have not paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellants failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court's order of August 28, 2015, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals' fees). --------

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; WALKER and MEIER, JJ. DELIVERED: December 1, 2016


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Dec 1, 2016
NO. 02-16-00362-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CLAYTON ARMSTRONG AND U-TURN WORLD MINISTRIES APPELLANTS v. HARTFORD…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Dec 1, 2016

Citations

NO. 02-16-00362-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2016)