From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Grube

United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Northeastern Division
Jun 29, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-13 (D.N.D. Jun. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-13.

June 29, 2011


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On June 14, 2011, the Honorable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge, filed a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, granting Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint and recommending that Defendant's motion to dismiss be denied (Doc. #21). No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation within the prescribed period of time.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, along with the entire file, and agrees with the Magistrate Judge's analysis and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. For the reasons set forth therein, Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Doc. #5) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Grube

United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Northeastern Division
Jun 29, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-13 (D.N.D. Jun. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Grube

Case Details

Full title:Kurt Armstrong, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence Grube, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Northeastern Division

Date published: Jun 29, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-13 (D.N.D. Jun. 29, 2011)