From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Gary

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 28, 2022
SC 164088 (Mich. Jul. 28, 2022)

Opinion

SC 164088 COA 351258

07-28-2022

ANGELO T. ARMSTRONG, CYNTHIA C. SNOW-ARMSTRONG, ROBERT D. LANE, JR., JANET E. LANE, and JOSEPH S. SAWYER, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants-Appellants, v. NICK GARY and LISA GARY, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs/ Cross-Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, and GLADWIN COUNTY TREASURER, Defendant/Cross-Defendant/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and TOWNSHIP OF TOBACCO, TOBACCO TOWNSHIP ASSESSOR, and TOBACCO TOWNSHIP SUPERVISOR, Third-Party Defendants.


Gladwin CC: 16-008700-CH

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

ORDER

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2021 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Gary

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 28, 2022
SC 164088 (Mich. Jul. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Gary

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO T. ARMSTRONG, CYNTHIA C. SNOW-ARMSTRONG, ROBERT D. LANE, JR., JANET…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jul 28, 2022

Citations

SC 164088 (Mich. Jul. 28, 2022)