From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Gary

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 13, 2022
972 N.W.2d 46 (Mich. 2022)

Opinion

SC: 164088 COA: 351258

04-13-2022

Angelo T. ARMSTRONG, Cynthia C. Snow-Armstrong, Robert D. Lane, Jr., Janet E. Lane, and Joseph S. Sawyer, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants-Appellants, v. Nick GARY and Lisa Gary, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs/Cross-Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Gladwin County Treasurer, Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and Township of Tobacco, Tobacco Township Assessor, and Tobacco Township Supervisor, Third-Party Defendants.


Order

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs/counterdefendants-appellants to extend the time for filing their reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before April 28, 2022.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Gary

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 13, 2022
972 N.W.2d 46 (Mich. 2022)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Gary

Case Details

Full title:Angelo T. ARMSTRONG, Cynthia C. Snow-Armstrong, Robert D. Lane, Jr., Janet…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Apr 13, 2022

Citations

972 N.W.2d 46 (Mich. 2022)