From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Gary

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 6, 2022
SC 164088 (Mich. May. 6, 2022)

Opinion

SC 164088 COA 351258

05-06-2022

ANGELO T. ARMSTRONG, CYNTHIA C. SNOW-ARMSTRONG, ROBERT D. LANE, JR., JANET E. LANE, and JOSEPH S. SAWYER, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants-Appellants, v. NICK GARY and LISA GARY, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs/ Cross-Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, and GLADWIN COUNTY TREASURER, Defendant/Cross-Defendant/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and TOWNSHIP OF TOBACCO, TOBACCO TOWNSHIP ASSESSOR, and TOBACCO TOWNSHIP SUPERVISOR, Third-Party Defendants.


Gladwin CC: 16-008700-CH

Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

ORDER

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

On order of the Chief Justice, the second motion of plaintiffs/counterdefendants-appellants to extend the time for filing their reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on May 2, 2022, is accepted as timely filed.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Gary

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 6, 2022
SC 164088 (Mich. May. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Gary

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO T. ARMSTRONG, CYNTHIA C. SNOW-ARMSTRONG, ROBERT D. LANE, JR., JANET…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: May 6, 2022

Citations

SC 164088 (Mich. May. 6, 2022)