From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Doyle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 1962
16 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

June 26, 1962


Judgment entered on August 16, 1961 unanimously modified on the law to the extent of striking out the last decretal paragraph and as so modified is affirmed, without costs. The retention of jurisdiction by the court as provided for in the last decretal paragraph may not be sustained. Such provision could well result in a complete breakdown of the normal functioning of the board of directors. It would, in effect, make the court a member of the board. Interference by courts with the normal internal management of business corporations is improper (see Chelrob, Inc., v. Barrett, 293 N.Y. 442, 459-460; Flynn v. Brooklyn City R.R. Co., 158 N.Y. 493, 507). Any subsequent improprieties or irregularities may be remedied by the institution of an appropriate independent action or proceeding.

Concur — Rabin, J.P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ. Motion to dismiss appeal denied.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Doyle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 1962
16 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Doyle

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. ARMSTRONG et al., Suing on Behalf of Themselves and All Other…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 26, 1962

Citations

16 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Levey v. Babb

As established by the afore-cited cases, there is therefore the power in this court, in the case at bar, to…