From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Doyle

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 27, 1962
185 N.E.2d 898 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Submitted September 24, 1962

Decided September 27, 1962

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, HENRY CLAY GREENBERG, J.

Lawrence Milberg for all motions.

George A. Spiegelberg and Max Schorr for motions to dispense with printing of exhibits and service of copies of record upon certain parties and opposed to cross motion.

Arthur H. Christy and Irving L. Golomb for cross motion.

Milton S. Gould opposed to motions to dispense with printing of exhibits and service of copies of record upon certain parties.

Barry A. Witchell opposed to cross motion.


Motion for order of consolidation denied as unnecessary.

Motions to dispense with printing of exhibits and with service of copies of record upon parties not having filed brief or argued in Appellate Division granted to the extent that the original exhibits may be handed up and one copy only of the record on appeal be served on the attorneys for each party respondent.

Cross motion denied except to the extent that defendants-respondents may on the argument of the appeal renew the contention that plaintiff-appellant Berman is not a party in interest.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Doyle

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 27, 1962
185 N.E.2d 898 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Doyle

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. ARMSTRONG et al., Suing on Behalf of Themselves and All Other…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 27, 1962

Citations

185 N.E.2d 898 (N.Y. 1962)
185 N.E.2d 898
233 N.Y.S.2d 457