From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Dart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 7, 2017
Case No. 16 C 3327 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 7, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 16 C 3327

09-07-2017

LAMONT ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS J. DART, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

On August 28, 2017 this Court issued a memorandum order dismissing this action (Dkt. No. 43), coupled with a judgment of dismissal (Dkt. No. 44). Because counsel who had been designated to represent prisoner plaintiff Lamont Armstrong has now reported that he was actively pursuing the action (including an ultimately successful effort at settlement) but had not kept this Court apprised of those efforts, counsel has filed an unopposed motion (Dkt. No. 46) to vacate Dkt. Nos. 43 and 44.

This Court grants that motion. Because the anticipated settlement needs implementation, this Court retains jurisdiction over this action and a status hearing date is set for 9 a.m. October 5, 2017.

/s/_________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge Date: September 7, 2017


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Dart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 7, 2017
Case No. 16 C 3327 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Dart

Case Details

Full title:LAMONT ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS J. DART, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 7, 2017

Citations

Case No. 16 C 3327 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 7, 2017)