From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 8, 2013
No. CV 12-7060-CW (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2013)

Summary

holding that the ALJ properly relied on the claimant's conservative treatment, including use of a heating pad, to discount her subjective pain complaints

Summary of this case from Higinio v. Colvin

Opinion

No. CV 12-7060-CW

07-08-2013

KIM ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Adminstration, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is remanded to defendant for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and consistent with the accompanying Decision and Order.

____________________

CARLA M. WOEHRLE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 8, 2013
No. CV 12-7060-CW (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2013)

holding that the ALJ properly relied on the claimant's conservative treatment, including use of a heating pad, to discount her subjective pain complaints

Summary of this case from Higinio v. Colvin
Case details for

Armstrong v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:KIM ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 8, 2013

Citations

No. CV 12-7060-CW (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

Higinio v. Colvin

See Parra v. Astrue, 481 F.3d 742, 751 (9th Cir. 2007) ("[E]vidence of 'conservative treatment' is sufficient…

Hidalgo v. Berryhill

"Courts specifically have recognized that the prescription of several of these medications connotes mental…