Armstrong v. City of Greensboro

Full title: ARTHUR R. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Oct 16, 2007

1:01CV00827 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2007)

Opinion

1:01CV00827.

October 16, 2007

ORDER

WILLIAM OSTEEN SR., District Judge

The Plaintiff, Arthur R. Armstrong, has paid a filing fee and filed this action against the City of Greensboro. As required by the amended injunction order of February 6, 2001 (1:97CV1028,Armstrong v. Koury Corp.), the Clerk has delivered the complaint to this court for determination of whether to allow the action to continue.

For the reasons set forth in a myriad of prior orders issued by this court, see, e.g., Armstrong v. City of Greensboro, 1:01CV810, this action is dismissed as an attempt to relitigate matters which have been previously dismissed. Even if it were not an attempt to resurrect a matter previously dismissed, this filing is insufficient to state a cause of action.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this proceeding should be and is hereby dismissed upon the court's own motion.