From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Cato

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 16, 1981
160 Ga. App. 393 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

62752.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 16, 1981.

Action on note. Douglas Superior Court. Before Judge Noland.

James R. Dollar, Jr., for appellants.

William L. Martin III, Leo W. Clifton, Sr., for appellee.


In this action on a promissory note, the defendant appeals from the grant of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36 (2).

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 16, 1981.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Cato

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 16, 1981
160 Ga. App. 393 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Cato

Case Details

Full title:ARMSTRONG et al. v. CATO

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 16, 1981

Citations

160 Ga. App. 393 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
287 S.E.2d 264

Citing Cases

Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Williams

In addition to proving the AGTS' car's stop was sudden, violent, and unusual, appellees had the burden of…

State Farm Mut. c. Co. v. Jinks

" We have held that the burden of proof to show unreasonableness of the claims, or a good faith reasonable…