From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Brown

united states district court FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 14, 2011
CASE NO. C 94 2307 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. C 94 2307 CW

11-14-2011

JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et. al., Defendants.

KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California JAY C. RUSSELL Supervising Deputy Attorney General DANIELLE O'BANNON Deputy Attorney General SCOTT J. FEUDALE Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants PRISON LAW OFFICE REBEKAH EVENSON, ESQ. PENNY GOLDBOLD, ESQ. CORENE KENDRICK, ESQ. ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP GAY GRUNFELD, ESQ. MICHAEL FREEDMAN, ESQ. BLAKE THOMPSON, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs


KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

JAY C. RUSSELL

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

DANIELLE O'BANNON

Deputy Attorney General

SCOTT J. FEUDALE

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

PRISON LAW OFFICE

REBEKAH EVENSON, ESQ.

PENNY GOLDBOLD, ESQ.

CORENE KENDRICK, ESQ.

ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP

GAY GRUNFELD, ESQ.

MICHAEL FREEDMAN, ESQ.

BLAKE THOMPSON, ESQ.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CHANGE THE TIME TO FILE THE

JOINT STATUS STATEMENT

Under the March 28, 2011, stipulation and order regarding the joint filing of periodic status statements, the parties shall file joint statements describing the status of the litigation on the fifteenth day of every month. Stip. & Order Re: Joint Filing Periodic Status Stmts. 2. In an attempt to resolve disputed issues short of Court intervention, the parties have agreed to meet and confer before each status statement is due.

The next joint status statement is due on November 15, 2011. Due to scheduling conflicts, and upon request of Defendants, the parties were unable to meet and confer before November 9, 2011. To allow the parties sufficient time to prepare a joint statement following their meeting, the parties stipulate to a one-week extension of time to prepare and file their joint status statement. The joint status statement shall be due on or before November 22, 2011.

The subsequent joint status statement is due on January 15, 2012. Due to scheduling conflicts, and upon request of Defendants, the parties will not be able to meet and confer until January 25, 2012. To allow the parties sufficient time to prepare a joint statement following the January meeting, the parties stipulate to a one-month extension of time to prepare and file their joint status statement. This joint status statement shall be due on or before February 15, 2012.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

JAY C. RUSSELL

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

DANIELLE O'BANNON

Deputy Attorney General

SCOTT J. FEUDALE

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

PRISON LAW OFFICE

CORENE KENDRICK

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED:

THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Brown

united states district court FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 14, 2011
CASE NO. C 94 2307 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et. al.…

Court:united states district court FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 14, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. C 94 2307 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)