From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division
Sep 6, 2011
Case No. 5:11-cv-165-Oc-TBS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 5:11-cv-165-Oc-TBS.

September 6, 2011


ORDER


Pending before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion For Entry of Judgment With Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. 15). Defendant requests the Court to remand this case to the Commissioner so that the Commissioner can take further administrative action in this case. Defendant represents that Plaintiff has no objection to the remand.

Pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 405(g) the Court is empowered to reverse the decision of the Commissioner with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. Shalala v. Schaefer, 113 S. Ct. 2625 (1993). The failure of the ALJ to develop the record constitutes sufficient grounds for remand.Brissette v. Heckler, 730 F.2d 548 (8th Cir. 1984), appeal after remand 613 F. Supp. 722 (E.D. Mo. 1985), judgment aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 784 F.2d 864 (8th Cir. 1986). Where the district court cannot discern the basis for the Commissioner's decision, a sentence-four remand may be appropriate to allow him to explain the basis for his decision. Falcon v. Heckler, 732 F.2d 827, 829-30 (11th Cir. 1984) (holding remand was appropriate to allow the ALJ to explain the basis for the determination that the claimant's depression did not significantly affect her ability to work and treating psychologist acknowledged that claimant had improved in response to treatment and could work in a supportive, noncompetitive, tailor-made work environment). On remand under sentence four, the ALJ should review the case on a complete record, including any new material evidence. Diorio v. Heckler, 721 F.2d 726, 729 (11th Cir. 1983) (finding that it was necessary for the ALJ on remand to consider psychiatric report tendered to Appeals Council);Reeves v. Heckler, 734 F.2d 519, 522 n. 1 (11th Cir. 1984) (holding that the ALJ should consider on remand the need for an orthopedic evaluation).

Therefore, following a careful review of the record and filings, the Court agrees with the parties that it is appropriate to remand this matter to the Commissioner. Accordingly, it is:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion For Entry of Judgment With Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc. 15) is hereby GRANTED.

(2) This action is hereby REVERSED AND REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner for the following reason:

Remand pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) makes the Plaintiff a prevailing party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and terminates this Court's jurisdiction over this matter. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 113 S. Ct. 2625, 125 L. Ed. 2d 239 (1993).

Upon remand, the ALJ will give further consideration to Plaintiff's RFC, including her nonexertional limitations and, if necessary, obtain supplemental vocational expert evidence.

(3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Ocala, Florida.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division
Sep 6, 2011
Case No. 5:11-cv-165-Oc-TBS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JANICE ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

Case No. 5:11-cv-165-Oc-TBS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 6, 2011)