From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 6, 1975
47 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

March 6, 1975

Appeal from the Jefferson Special Term.

Present — Cardamone, J.P., Simons, Mahoney, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Trial Term, Lynch, J., to grant judgment to plaintiff. Memorandum: In this default divorce action based upon cruel and inhuman treatment the facts reveal that plaintiff first learned of his wife's infidelity by way of an anonymous telephone call and then his wife told him that she could no longer live with him because she was in love with another man. The plaintiff testified to his mental upset and loss of work as a result. In Hessen v. Hessen ( 33 N.Y.2d 406) the Court of Appeals held that "An appearance of misconduct which in a matured marriage might fail to justify a finding of substantial misconduct * * * may in a newer marriage justify or even compel an inference of substantial misconduct". The court further stated that in the absence of objective proof of physical or mental injury to the plaintiff, which it held is not a prerequisite to relief, "Among the factors that the courts may properly consider are the respective ages of the husband and wife and the duration of their marriage" ( supra, p. 411). The parties to this action are young, without children and have been married less than two years. At the time of the trial the defendant-wife had been gone for five months. The divorce was uncontested at Trial Term and the defendant-wife did not appear or file a brief on this appeal. She seeks no alimony and there is no evidence that she would lose any interest in a marital abode. We conclude that this record contains sufficient evidence of substantial misconduct on the part of the defendant-wife to permit the granting of a divorce and that its denial by Trial Term was an abuse of its discretion. Where as a result of the substantial misconduct of one spouse the marriage relationship is no longer viable or is "defunct" (1 Foster Freed, Law and the Family. New York, § 6:11) or "dead" (cf. Hessen v. Hessen, 33 N.Y.2d 406, 411, supra) an uncontested default divorce should be granted to the complaining spouse on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 6, 1975
47 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG C. ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. SHELIA J. ARMSTRONG, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 6, 1975

Citations

47 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Nagerl v. Nagerl

Defendant also denies having an adulterous relationship with her physician or even delivering the notes to…

Haydock v. Haydock

In any case, the husband need not prove adultery to sustain his cause of action. Where the conduct is…