From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong ex rel. A.L.J. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 29, 2020
Civil Case No. 19-12687 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 29, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 19-12687

07-29-2020

Sabrina Armstrong, on behalf of A.L.J., Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING 7/9/20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Sabrina Armstrong, on behalf of her minor granddaughter, filed this action appealing a final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security denying her granddaughter's application for supplemental security income benefits under the Social Security Act.

The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Stafford for determination of all non-dispositive motions under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and issuance of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). Thereafter, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment.

In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued on July 9, 2020, the magistrate judge recommends that the Court: 1) grant Plaintiff's motion; 2) deny Defendant's motion; and 3) remand the matter under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the R&R. (ECF No. 14).

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R. "The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made." Id.

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither party has filed objections to the R&R. The Court hereby ADOPTS the July 9, 2020 R&R.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter is REMANDED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the magistrate judge's R&R dated July 9, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Sean F. Cox

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge Dated: July 29, 2020


Summaries of

Armstrong ex rel. A.L.J. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 29, 2020
Civil Case No. 19-12687 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Armstrong ex rel. A.L.J. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Sabrina Armstrong, on behalf of A.L.J., Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 29, 2020

Citations

Civil Case No. 19-12687 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 29, 2020)