From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstead v. Trump

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 9, 2022
1:22-CV-1498 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-CV-1498 (LTS)

03-09-2022

BRENDA C. ARMSTEAD, Plaintiff, v. FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge

On November 8, 2017, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new civil action in this court in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Armstead v. Crist, ECF 1:17-CV-7537, 4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 8, 2017). Plaintiff files this new pro se action, has not paid the fees to bring this action, and has not sought leave to file from the court. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's November 8, 2017 order in Armstead, ECF 1:17-CV-7537, 4.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order and note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Armstead v. Trump

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 9, 2022
1:22-CV-1498 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Armstead v. Trump

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA C. ARMSTEAD, Plaintiff, v. FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 9, 2022

Citations

1:22-CV-1498 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2022)