From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstead v. Andrew

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 18, 2022
22-CV-0430 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-0430 (LTS)

03-18-2022

BRENDA C. ARMSTEAD, Plaintiff, v. PRINCE ANDREW; THE UNITED STATES, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge.

By order dated February 1, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court directs the Clerk of Court to terminate Plaintiff's motion to disregard the Court's February 1, 2022, order (ECF 3).

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Armstead v. Andrew

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 18, 2022
22-CV-0430 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Armstead v. Andrew

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA C. ARMSTEAD, Plaintiff, v. PRINCE ANDREW; THE UNITED STATES…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 18, 2022

Citations

22-CV-0430 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2022)