From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armour v. City of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1966
26 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

July 5, 1966


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR (art. 78) to declare void an amendment of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Newburgh, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered September 16, 1965, which (1) stayed the proceeding; (2) ordered its dismissal if this court should hold "that Mr. Justice Bailey's decision of March 30, 1965, dismissing the petition in the prior proceeding of Casterlin, et al. v. The City of Newburgh, Index No. 354/1965, was proper"; and (3) ordered that "upon a reversal of the aforesaid decision * * * an order may be entered consolidating both proceedings for all purposes." Appeal dismissed, with costs to respondents. The order from which petitioners have appealed is not appealable as of right but only by permission, proof of which does not appear in the record (CPLR 5701, subd. [b], par. 1; 5701, subd. [c]). Beldock, P.J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Armour v. City of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1966
26 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Armour v. City of Newburgh

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ARMOUR et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEWBURGH et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 5, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Matter of Altschul v. Butterfield Farms, Inc.

Since no permission to appeal has been obtained, the appeal must be dismissed. ( Matter of O'Neill v.…