Arminan v. State

Full title: Jiskly ARMINAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Apr 13, 2016

190 So. 3d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 3D16–381.

04-13-2016

Jiskly ARMINAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jiskly Arminan, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jiskly Arminan, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, LAGOA and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, with the clarification that the prohibition in the decretal part of the trial court's denial order, “Defendant is hereby PROHIBITED from filing any further motions without representation by a licensed member of the Florida Bar,” is limited to the case in which that Order was entered, namely State v. Arminan, Case No. F03–9926C, Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit for Miami–Dade County, Florida.