From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armijo v. Ozone Networks, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 26, 2022
3:22-CV-00112-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Apr. 26, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-CV-00112-LRH-CLB

04-26-2022

ROBERT ARMIJO, Plaintiff, v. OZONE NETWORKS, INC. d/b/a OPENSEA, a New York Corporation, YUGA LABS, LLC d/b/a BORED APE YACHT CLUB, a Delaware limited liability company; LOOKSRARE; and DOES 1 TO 50, Defendants.

ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP Romaine C. Marshall Michelle D. Alarie (Nevada Bar No. 11894) Romaine C. Marshall (Utah Bar No. 9654) Jose Abarca (Utah Bar No. 12762) Emily Nuvan (Utah Bar No. 17722) Attoreys for Plaintiff Robert Armijo FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. John D. Tennert John D. Tennert III (Nevada Bar No. 11728) 3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Ste. 200 7800 Rancharrah Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Reno, NV 89511 Michael S. Dicke (CA Bar No. 158187) Jennifer C. Bretan (CA Bar No. 233475) FENWICK & WEST LLP Attorneys for Defendant Yuga Labs LLC DICKINSON WRIGHT By: John P. Desmond John P. Desmond (Nevada Bar No. 5618) Reno, NV 89501 Attorneys for Defendant Ozone Networks, Inc. d/b/a OpenSea


ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP

Romaine C. Marshall

Michelle D. Alarie (Nevada Bar No. 11894)

Romaine C. Marshall (Utah Bar No. 9654)

Jose Abarca (Utah Bar No. 12762)

Emily Nuvan (Utah Bar No. 17722)

Attoreys for Plaintiff Robert Armijo

FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.

John D. Tennert

John D. Tennert III (Nevada Bar No. 11728)

3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Ste. 200 7800 Rancharrah Parkway

Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Reno, NV 89511

Michael S. Dicke (CA Bar No. 158187)

Jennifer C. Bretan (CA Bar No. 233475)

FENWICK & WEST LLP

Attorneys for Defendant Yuga Labs LLC

DICKINSON WRIGHT

By: John P. Desmond

John P. Desmond (Nevada Bar No. 5618)

Reno, NV 89501

Attorneys for Defendant Ozone Networks, Inc. d/b/a OpenSea

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)

Honorable Larry United States District Court Judge

Plaintiff Robert Armijo (“Plaintiff') and Defendants Ozone Networks, Inc. d/b/a Opensea (“OpenSea”), and Yuga Labs LLC (“Yuga Labs”) (together with OpenSea, the “Stipulating Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on February 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the above-entitled action (ECF No. 1), image later corrected on March 1, 2022 (ECF No. 6);

WHEREAS, Yuga Labs executed a waiver of the service of summons dated March 3, 2022, thereby establishing a responsive pleading deadline of May 2, 2022 (ECF No. 15);

WHEREAS, OpenSea executed a waiver of the service of summons dated March 4, 2022, establishing a responsive pleading deadline of May 3, 2022 (ECF No. 14);

WHEREAS, this is the first stipulation for extension of time to respond to the Complaint;

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and the Stipulating Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate that good cause exists under Local Rule 26-3 to extend the Stipulating Defendants' deadline to respond to the Complaint, and jointly request, subject to the Court's approval, as follows:

The Stipulating Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended to and including June 3, 2022.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Armijo v. Ozone Networks, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 26, 2022
3:22-CV-00112-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Apr. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Armijo v. Ozone Networks, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ARMIJO, Plaintiff, v. OZONE NETWORKS, INC. d/b/a OPENSEA, a New…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 26, 2022

Citations

3:22-CV-00112-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Apr. 26, 2022)