From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armentero v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 8, 2008
Case No. 2:07-cv-00268 JKS CMK P (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-00268 JKS CMK P.

May 8, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 25, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

The Court agrees that Plaintiff's vague and conclusory allegations in the Second Amended Complaint fail to state a claim. Although Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, now superseded by the Second Amended Complaint, had managed to state a claim regarding lack of exercise, that claim was abandoned when it was not realleged in the Second Amended Complaint. Parrino v. FHP, Inc., 146 F.3d 699, 704 (9th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 25, 2008 are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim; and

3. The Clerk shall close this case and enter judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Armentero v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 8, 2008
Case No. 2:07-cv-00268 JKS CMK P (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Armentero v. Tilton

Case Details

Full title:LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO, Plaintiff, v. JAMES TILTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 8, 2008

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-00268 JKS CMK P (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2008)

Citing Cases

Armentero v. Schwarz

Prior to the date he filed this action, Plaintiff had at least four dismissals that qualify as strikes under…