From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armentero v. Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 4, 2010
No. CIV S-09-0503 JAM KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-0503 JAM KJM P.

November 4, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff seeks dismissal of this action under Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because plaintiff has provided the court with the notice required under that rule, and because defendants have not yet filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, this action is DISMISSED.

The court notes that plaintiff also has filed a request for appointment of counsel. His request for dismissal is unequivocal, however, making the request for counsel moot. The findings and recommendations filed on October 19 also are moot.

DATED: November 3, 2010.


Summaries of

Armentero v. Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 4, 2010
No. CIV S-09-0503 JAM KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Armentero v. Knowles

Case Details

Full title:LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO, Plaintiff, v. MIKE KNOWLES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 4, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-0503 JAM KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2010)