From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armenta-Anaya v. Aepaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 13, 2006
No. CV 06-0240-PHX-DGC (HCE) (D. Ariz. Jun. 13, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV 06-0240-PHX-DGC (HCE).

June 13, 2006


ORDER


This is one of more than one thousand civil rights actions filed since September 2004 by Maricopa County Jail inmates. Plaintiff is an inmate at the Durango Jail in Phoenix, Arizona. The Court will require an answer to the Complaint.

A. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Filing Fee.

Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $250.00, but no initial partial filing fee is assessed. The fee will be collected monthly in payments of 20 percent of the previous month's income, each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect the fees according to the statutory formula. B. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints.

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the Plaintiff has raised claims that are legally "frivolous or malicious," that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).

C. Complaint.

Plaintiff sues Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio in his individual and official capacities. Plaintiff alleges three counts for relief, to wit: (1) improper diet; (2) overcrowding and associated conditions; and (3) unsanitary conditions (Doc. # 1 at 4-6). He claims he has suffered from (1) constant hunger; (2) nausea; (3) indigestion; (4) sleeplessness because of the overcrowding and illumination; (5) back and neck pain; (6) dry skin; (7) sore throat and sinus symptoms; (8) staph infections; and (9) skin irritations. Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant Joseph Arpaio, the Maricopa County Sheriff, is liable because he sets the policies and procedures at the jail. In recompense, Plaintiff seeks monetary and injunctive relief. These allegations adequately state a claim, and the Court will require an answer to the Complaint.

D. Warnings. 1. Release

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay the balance, or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result in dismissal.

2. Address Changes

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address 10 days before the move is effective, if practicable. See LRCIV 83.3(d). Plaintiff shall not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal. 3. Copies

Plaintiff must serve Defendant, or counsel if an appearance has been entered, a copy of every document that he files. FED. R. CIV. P. 5(a). Each filing must be accompanied by a certificate stating that a copy of the filing was served. FED. R. CIV. P. 5(d). Also, Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. LRCIV 5.4. The Court may strike any filing that fails to comply with these requirements.

4. Possible dismissal

Plaintiff is warned that failure to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these warnings, may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court may dismiss action for failure to comply with any order of the Court).

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

(2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $250.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee.

(3) The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint, this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Arpaio.

(4) Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 20 days of the date of filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order.

(5) If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on each Defendant within 120 days of the filing of the complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 16.2(b)(2)(B)(i).

(6) The United States Marshal shall retain the Summons, a copy of the Complaint, and a copy of this Order for future use.

(7) The United States Marshal shall notify Defendant of the commencement of this action and request waiver of service of the summons pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The notice to Defendant shall include a copy of this Order. The Marshal shall file waivers of service of the summons or requests for waivers that were returned as undeliverable as soon as they are received. If a waiver of service of summons is not returned by a Defendant within thirty days from the date the request for waiver was sent by the Marshal, the Marshal shall:

(a) Personally serve copies of the Summons, Complaint, and this Order upon the Defendant pursuant to Rule 4(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
(b) Within 10 days after personal service is effected, file the return of service for the Defendant, along with evidence of the attempt to secure a waiver of service of the summons and of the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service upon the Defendant. The costs of service shall be enumerated on the return of service form (USM-285) and shall include the costs incurred by the Marshal for photocopying additional copies of the Summons, Complaint, or this Order and for preparing new process receipt and return forms (USM-285), if required. Costs of service will be taxed against the personally served defendant pursuant to Rule 4(d)(2) and (5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

(8) A Defendant who agrees to waive service of the Summons and Complaint shall return the signed waiver forms to the United States Marshal, not the Plaintiff.

(9) Defendant shall answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(10) Any answer or responsive pleading shall state the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, responsive pleading, or other motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed.

(11) This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Hector C. Estrada under Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Armenta-Anaya v. Aepaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 13, 2006
No. CV 06-0240-PHX-DGC (HCE) (D. Ariz. Jun. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Armenta-Anaya v. Aepaio

Case Details

Full title:Joel Armenta-Anaya, Plaintiff, v. Joseph Arpaio, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 13, 2006

Citations

No. CV 06-0240-PHX-DGC (HCE) (D. Ariz. Jun. 13, 2006)