Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00048-MSK-KLM
06-21-2012
DALE P. ARMELIN, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK R. DONAHUE, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Deny and/or Dismiss Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion in Response for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) and to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) [Docket No. 67; Filed June 20, 2012] (the "Motion"). As an initial matter, the Motion does not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A, which provides as follows:
The Court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter. The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule.The Motion is subject to denial on this basis alone. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#67] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.