From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armelia B. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 20, 2023
2:23-cv-01699-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01699-NJK

10-20-2023

ARMELIA B., Plaintiffs, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendants.


ORDER

[DOCKET NO. 4]

Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge

Pending before the Court is a petition to practice pro hac vice filed by attorney Hannalore B. Merritt. Docket No. 4. Although the petitioner is required to list all applications to practice pro hac vice she has filed during the past three years, id. at 3, Attorney Merritt has failed to identify her petition that was denied in Shiegel v. Saul, 2:21-cv-00556-NJK. Moreover, Attorney Merritt has elsewhere identified bar admissions in the states of Connecticut and Mississippi, see id., Docket No. 10 at 6, but has failed to provide certificates of good standing for those state bars in this case. Lastly, the petition explains that a list is attached with the other federal courts in which Attorney Merritt has been admitted, see Docket No. 4 at 2, but no such list is actually attached. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Armelia B. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 20, 2023
2:23-cv-01699-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Armelia B. v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:ARMELIA B., Plaintiffs, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 20, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01699-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2023)