From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armco Steel Corp. v. United States Steel Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 23, 1963
316 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 14117.

Argued April 2, 1963.

Decided April 23, 1963.

Gibson Yungblut, Cincinnati, Ohio (Yungblut, Melville, Strasser Foster, Cincinnati, Ohio, Brown, Critchlow, Flick Peckham, Jo. Bailey Brown, Fulton B. Flick, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Theodore S. Kenyon and Malvin R. Mandelbaum, New York City (Elder W. Marshall, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., Kenyon Kenyon, New York City, Richard A. Huettner, William T. Boland, Jr., New York City, and Donald G. Dalton, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.


We have before us on appeal the validity of three United States patents which expired before the trial in the court below and which were found to be both invalid and not infringed by the defendant.

We have carefully reviewed the extensive record and have weighed the arguments of the respective parties as appears from their briefs and at the full hearing. We entertain no doubt that the patents are invalidated by the prior art and that there was no infringement. Accordingly, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Armco Steel Corp. v. United States Steel Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 23, 1963
316 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Armco Steel Corp. v. United States Steel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Apr 23, 1963

Citations

316 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1963)

Citing Cases

Cleveland Fabricating Co. v. Adsure, Inc.

A patent is presumed to be valid. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. P. A. Geier Co., 118 F.2d 221, 225 (6th…