From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armco. Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 2, 1985
760 F.2d 249 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

Summary

affirming on the basis of the Court of International Trade opinion

Summary of this case from Angus Chemical Company v. United States

Opinion

Appeal No. 84-1715.

May 2, 1985.

Terence P. Stewart, Stewart Stewart, of Washington, D.C., argued for appellants. With him on the brief were Eugene L. Stewart, Paul W. Jameson and Mary E. Tuck.

Jack M. Simmons, III, Office of the Gen. Counsel, U.S. Intern. Trade Com'n, of Washington, D.C., argued for appellee U.S. With him on the brief was Michael P. Mabile, Acting Gen. Counsel.

Garry P. McCormack, Fox Glynn Melamed, New York City, argued for intervenor Tecnor. With him on the brief were Raymond F. Stechel and John R. Haran.

Appealed from U.S. Court of International Trade; Judge Maletz.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, 590 F. Supp. 1273 (Ct.Int'l Trade 1984), that substantial evidence supported the United States International Trade Commission's negative injury determinations with respect to imports of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Spain, France, the United Kingdom, and Brazil.

Decision

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by Senior Judge Maletz.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Armco. Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 2, 1985
760 F.2d 249 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

affirming on the basis of the Court of International Trade opinion

Summary of this case from Angus Chemical Company v. United States

approving analysis of calendar year data rather than quarterly data

Summary of this case from Nitrogen Solutions Fair Trade Comm v. U.S.
Case details for

Armco. Inc. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ARMCO INC., BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP., FLORIDA WIRE CABLE CO., AND SHINKO WIRE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: May 2, 1985

Citations

760 F.2d 249 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Metallverken Nederland B.V. v. U.S.

The Commission has discretion to determine the appropriate periods of investigation. Wieland Werke, AG v.…

Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United States

The parties agree that the Commission may make an affirmative finding only when it finds both (1) threat of…