From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armand Cerrone, Inc. v. Sicoli Massaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 14, 1993
192 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

April 14, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Niagara County, Rath, Jr., J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.


Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Factual issues exist regarding the terms and conditions of the alleged oral agreement between the parties for the removal of rock at the construction project. Although defendant stated in its answer that an agreement existed, that statement does not constitute an admission that the parties agreed to the specific terms alleged by plaintiff in its complaint. To the contrary, defendant's statement is consistent with affidavits and other evidentiary materials submitted by defendant setting forth a conflicting version of the terms and conditions of that agreement. Under the circumstances, Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on its fourth cause of action.


Summaries of

Armand Cerrone, Inc. v. Sicoli Massaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 14, 1993
192 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Armand Cerrone, Inc. v. Sicoli Massaro

Case Details

Full title:ARMAND CERRONE, INC., Respondent, v. SICOLI MASSARO, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1993

Citations

192 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
596 N.Y.S.2d 239

Citing Cases

Clause v. Globe Metallurgical, Inc.

While activities such as repairing or altering a building or structure constitute protected activities under…