From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armado v. HI. Q, Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Sep 9, 2021
No. CIV-21-608-F (W.D. Okla. Sep. 9, 2021)

Opinion

CIV-21-608-F

09-09-2021

TARA ARMADO and MAKI TYNER, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HI. Q, INC., d/b/a HEALTH IQ INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The court is in receipt of plaintiffs' First Amended Class Action Complaint properly filed pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. As the properly filed amended pleading supersedes the original Class Action Complaint, see, Murray v. Archambo, 132 F.3d 609, 612 (10th Cir. 1998); Miller v. Glanz, 948 F.2d 1562, 1565 (10th Cir. 1991); Gilles v. United States, 906 F.2d 1386, 1389 (10th Cir. 1990), the court DENIES as MOOT Defendant Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (doc. no. 8).

IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

Armado v. HI. Q, Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Sep 9, 2021
No. CIV-21-608-F (W.D. Okla. Sep. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Armado v. HI. Q, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TARA ARMADO and MAKI TYNER, individually and on behalf of all other…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 9, 2021

Citations

No. CIV-21-608-F (W.D. Okla. Sep. 9, 2021)