Opinion
2:19-cv-00743-CDS-DJA
02-09-2023
KELSY ARLITZ, individually; GARY ARLITZ, as general guardian of ward KELSY ARLITZ; KARIE ARLITZ, as general guardian of ward KELSY ARLITZ, Plaintiffs v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY; DOES 1 through 100 and ROE CORPORATIONS 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants
Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP Cary B. Lerman California Bar No. 54937 (admitted pro hac vice) Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP Jacob Max Rosen California Bar No. 310789 (admitted pro hac vice) McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP James P. Wagoner California Bar No. 58553 (admitted pro hac vice) Jonathan W. Carlson Nevada Bar No. 10536Attorneys for GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY PRINCE LAW GROUPDennis M. Prince Nevada Bar No. 5092 Kevin T. Strong Nevada Bar No. 12107 Attorneys for Plaintiffs McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP James P. Wagoner Admitted Pro Hac Vice Jonathan W. Carlson Nevada Bar No. 10536 Attorneys for Defendant
Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP Cary B. Lerman California Bar No. 54937 (admitted pro hac vice)
Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP Jacob Max Rosen California Bar No. 310789 (admitted pro hac vice)
McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP James P. Wagoner California Bar No. 58553 (admitted pro hac vice)
Jonathan W. Carlson Nevada Bar No. 10536Attorneys for GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY
PRINCE LAW GROUPDennis M. Prince Nevada Bar No. 5092 Kevin T. Strong Nevada Bar No. 12107 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP James P. Wagoner Admitted Pro Hac Vice Jonathan W. Carlson Nevada Bar No. 10536 Attorneys for Defendant
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S NOVEMBER 22, 2022 ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM FOR BREACH OF THE COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING AND FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A REPLY THERETO (FIRST REQUEST)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs KELSY ARLITZ, individually; GARY ARLITZ, as general guardian of ward KELSY ARLITZ, and KARIE ARLITZ, as general guardian of ward KELSY ARLITZ, through their counsel of record, PRINCE LAW GROUP, and Defendant GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, through its counsel of record, McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP and MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON, LLP that Defendant be granted an extension of time in which to file a Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's November 22, 2022 Order Granting, in Part, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' Claim for Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing until February 28, 2003, and that Plaintiffs be granted an extension of time in which to file a Reply until March 28, 2023.
This is the first stipulation for extension of time to file Defendant's Response and Plaintiffs' Reply.
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request this Court to approve the foregoing stipulation. Their requested extension of time is not made in bad faith or to unnecessarily delay these proceedings.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.