Arlington Hotel Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

4 Citing cases

  1. N.L.R.B. v. John T. Jones

    575 F.3d 857 (8th Cir. 2009)

    According to the Company, the Board should have ended one employee's make-whole period when he moved from Springfield to St. Louis. The Company asserts that by moving, the former employee was no longer seeking "substantially equivalent alternate employment." See Arlington Hotel Co. v. NLRB, 876 F.2d 678, 680 (8th Cir. 1989). The facts refute the Company's assertion.

  2. Woodline Motor Freight v. N.L.R.B

    972 F.2d 222 (8th Cir. 1992)   Cited 7 times
    Upholding formula chosen by the administrative law judge as "fair and reasonable"

    Id. An unlawfully discharged employee is "obligated to search for substantially equivalent" employment. Arlington Hotel Co. v. NLRB, 876 F.2d 678, 680 (8th Cir. 1989). But the "employee is not required to seek or retain a job more onerous than the job from which he or she was discharged."

  3. Miller v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Minn.

    Case No. 15-CV-3740 (PJS/LIB) (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2019)   Cited 2 times

    See Canny v. Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up Bottling Grp., 439 F.3d 894, 905 (8th Cir. 2006) (defendant failed to meet its burden to show failure to mitigate where, among other things, its offer of reinstatement would have required plaintiff to relocate); Arlington Hotel Co. v. NLRB, 876 F.2d 678, 680 (8th Cir. 1989) ("Here, AHC did not show the number of substantially equivalent positions in the Hot Springs area for which Avant could have applied. Thus, the record does not support AHC's contention that Avant's efforts to find employment before March 1982 were deficient."

  4. In re Acker

    696 F. Supp. 591 (N.D. Ala. 1988)   Cited 3 times

    The undersigned will not presently recuse himself in all cases in which the United States is a party. The undersigned will in the future make a case-by-case evaluation, either on motion or, if no motion is filed, sua sponte, of the cases in which the United States is a party, keeping in mind (as the parties in such cases should) the finding by the Court of Appeals in United States v. White, 876 F.2d 678, that this judge's position is hardened against the United States. APPENDIX ORDER OR OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW CAUSE