From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arline v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 2, 2011
CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01097-LJO-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01097-LJO-GBC (PC).

September 2, 2011


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION AND STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S SURREPLIES (ECF Nos. 86, 87, 88, 89)


Plaintiff Keith Duane Arline, Jr. ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 19, 2011, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 79.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on June 27, 2011, and Defendant filed a reply on June 29, 2011. (ECF Nos. 82, 83, 84, 85.) On July 20, 2011, Plaintiff filed three surreplies. (ECF Nos. 86, 87, 88.) Defendant filed a Motion to Strike on July 28, 2011. (ECF No. 89.) Plaintiff did not file a response to the Motion.

Parties do not have a right to file a surreply under the Local Rules or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Local Rule 230(I).

Therefore, Defendant's Motion to Strike is GRANTED and Plaintiff's surreplies are ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arline v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 2, 2011
CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01097-LJO-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Arline v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:KEITH DUANE ARLINE, JR., Plaintiff, v. KEN CLARK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 2, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01097-LJO-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)