From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arkoh v. Navarro

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 10, 2018
160 A.D.3d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

6254N Index 304260/14

04-10-2018

Philip ARKOH, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Felix NAVARRO III, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Law Offices of Alexander Bespechny, Bronx (Louis Badolato of counsel), for appellant.


Law Offices of Alexander Bespechny, Bronx (Louis Badolato of counsel), for appellant.

Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kahn, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered January 6, 2017, which, insofar as appealed from, purportedly granted defendants' motion to compel plaintiff to provide access to his Facebook account, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken by a nonaggrieved party.

A reading of the entire order appealed from makes clear that the motion court denied so much of defendants' motion as sought access to plaintiff's Facebook account. As a result, plaintiff was not aggrieved by the order, and therefore has no standing to appeal (see CPLR 5511 ).


Summaries of

Arkoh v. Navarro

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 10, 2018
160 A.D.3d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Arkoh v. Navarro

Case Details

Full title:Philip Arkoh, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Felix Navarro III, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 10, 2018

Citations

160 A.D.3d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 2440
71 N.Y.S.3d 351