Opinion
2013-08076, Index No. 23955/12.
04-08-2015
Katarzyna Wilinska, Kew Gardens, N.Y., for petitioner. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Francis F. Caputo, Elizabeth I. Freedman, and Hanh H. Le of counsel), for respondent.
Katarzyna Wilinska, Kew Gardens, N.Y., for petitioner.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Francis F. Caputo, Elizabeth I. Freedman, and Hanh H. Le of counsel), for respondent.
Opinion Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the City of New York, Department of Finance, Parking Violations Adjudication Division, dated October 10, 2012, affirming a determination of an Administrative Law Judge dated June 20, 2012, which, after a hearing, inter alia, reinstated two previously dismissed parking violations, and imposed a penalty.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
“To annul an administrative determination made after a hearing directed by law at which evidence is taken, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence to support the determination” (Matter of Mannino v. Department of Motor Vehs. of State of N.Y.-Traffic Violations Div., 101 A.D.3d 880, 880, 956 N.Y.S.2d 120 ; see Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, 38, 724 N.Y.S.2d 680, 747 N.E.2d 1280 ; Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 N.Y.2d 222, 231, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321 ). Contrary to the petitioner's contention, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination under review (see Matter of Peterson v. State of N.Y. Dept. of Motor Vehs., 90 A.D.3d 1055, 934 N.Y.S.2d 837 ; 19 RCNY 39–10[j] ). Accordingly, the determination must be confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding dismissed.
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
RIVERA, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.