From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arkema, Inc. v. Asarco, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jan 22, 2007
Case No. C05-5087RBL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 22, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. C05-5087RBL.

January 22, 2007


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Defendant Oline's Motion to Exclude New Opinions in Supplemental Expert Report of Paul F. Fuglevand [Dkt. #186].

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court rules as follows:

Defendant Oline seeks to exclude the opinions expressed by one of plaintiffs' experts in a supplemental report. Given that the trial is over three months away, given the history of the timing of expert disclosures previously in this matter, and given that plaintiffs have offered to allow a further deposition of their expert, the Court will deny the motion and allow Defendant Oline to further depose Mr. Fuglevand at a mutually agreeable time before February 16, 2007. It is therefore,

ORDERED that Defendant Oline's Motion to Exclude [Dkt. #186] is DENIED. Oline may further depose Mr. Fuglevand on or before February 16, 2007.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing pro se.


Summaries of

Arkema, Inc. v. Asarco, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jan 22, 2007
Case No. C05-5087RBL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 22, 2007)
Case details for

Arkema, Inc. v. Asarco, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ARKEMA, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation and GENERAL METALS OF TACOMA…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Jan 22, 2007

Citations

Case No. C05-5087RBL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 22, 2007)