From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aris v. N.Y. Guard

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 23, 2022
22-CV-5019 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-5019 (VEC)

06-23-2022

JORAM J. ARIS, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK GUARD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF SERVICE

VALERIE CAPRONI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, paid the filing fees to commence this action.

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses as to Defendants New York National Guard; New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs; the Adjutant General aka TAG MG Raymond F. Shields, Jr.; and Governor Kathy Hochul. Plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on each Defendant within 90 days of the issuance of the summonses. If within those 90 days, Plaintiff has not either served Defendants or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss the claims against Defendants under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute.

SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Aris v. N.Y. Guard

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 23, 2022
22-CV-5019 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Aris v. N.Y. Guard

Case Details

Full title:JORAM J. ARIS, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK GUARD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 23, 2022

Citations

22-CV-5019 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2022)