From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arington v. Depalma

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Jul 6, 2023
1:21-cv-13057 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 6, 2023)

Opinion

1:21-cv-13057

07-06-2023

SHRONDREY ARINGTON, Plaintiff, v. DEPALMA, Defendant.


Honorable Curtis Ivy Jr. United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE, AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 16, 2023, Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy Jr., issued a report recommending that Plaintiff Shrondrey Arington's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 34; see also FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). Judge Ivy provided 14 days to object, but the parties did not do so. They have therefore forfeited their right to appeal Judge Morris's findings. See Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530-31 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). There is no clear error in the Report.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Judge Ivy's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 34, is ADOPTED. Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 30, is DENIED AS MOOT.

This is a final order and closes the above-captioned case.


Summaries of

Arington v. Depalma

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Jul 6, 2023
1:21-cv-13057 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Arington v. Depalma

Case Details

Full title:SHRONDREY ARINGTON, Plaintiff, v. DEPALMA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Jul 6, 2023

Citations

1:21-cv-13057 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 6, 2023)