Arilex Tropicana Assocs. v. Walmart Inc.

Full title: ARILEX TROPICANA ASSOCIATES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. WALMART INC., Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 21, 2022

2:22-cv-00344-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00344-JCM-VCF

10-21-2022

ARILEX TROPICANA ASSOCIATES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. WALMART INC., Defendant.

CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT COUNTERCLAIM (ECF NO. 22)

CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Walmart Inc. filed a motion for leave to supplement its counterclaim. ECF No. 22. The parties filed a stipulation that states that they have reached a settlement agreement and are in the process of formalizing the agreement, which will lead to dismissal of this case. ECF No. 29.

ACCORDINGLY, I ORDER THAT the motion for leave to supplement (ECF No. 22).is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with leave to refile, if needed.

I FURTHER ORDER that all remaining discovery deadlines (ECF No. 21) are VACATED until further order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.